Âü°í¹®Çå
±è»óÈÆ, À̽ÃÈÆ (1998). °³ÀÎÀÇ ³íÀZ(argumentativeness)ÀÌ ºñ±³±¤°íÀÇ È¿°ú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â
¿µÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ±¤°íÇבּ¸, 9(2), 31- 52.
±è¿Ï¼®, ±ÇÀ±¼÷ (1997). ±¤°íŵµ°¡ »óǥŵµ Çü¼º¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡´Â °úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »óǥģ¼÷µµÀÇ ¿µÇâ. ±¤°í¿¬±¸,
34, 31- 49.
±èÀçÁø (1990). ¼ÒºñÀÚŵµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ÀνÄÀû ¹ÝÀÀ Á¢±Ù¹ý. ±¤°í¿¬±¸, 9, 99- 118.
³ëÁ¤È (1999). ±¤°íÇ¥Çö¿ä¼Ò¿Í ¿©¹éÀÇ »ó°ü°ü°è¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. È«ÀÍ´ëÇб³ »ê¾÷¹Ì¼ú´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
¸í±¤ÁÖ (1991). ±¤°í ¾ÆÆ®¿öÅ©. ¼¿ï: ³ª³²ÃâÆÇ»ç.
¾ö±âÅ (1994). ¿µ»óÀÇ ÀǹÌü°è¿Í ÀǹÌÈ °úÁ¤¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ¼°´ëÇб³ ½Å¹®¹æ¼ÛÇаú ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
À¯½Â±æ (1999). ÀÇ·ù±¤°í īŻ·Î±×ÀÇ Ç¥ÇöÇü½Ä¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. Çѱ¹¿Ü±¹¾î´ëÇб³ Á¤Ã¥°úÇдëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
À°±Ù¹è (2000). TV±¤°í¿¡¼ ħ¹¬ÀÌ ¼ÒºñÀÚ ¹ÝÀÀ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ½Å¹®¹æ¼Û´ëÇпø ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
ÀÌ°ß½Ç (1990). Àμâ¸Åü ±¤°í µðÀÚÀÎ. ¼¿ï: ³ª³²ÃâÆÇ»ç.
ÀÌ»óºó, ¸®´ë·æ (2000). ¸¶ÄÉÆÃ ±¤°íôµµ ÇÚµåºÏ. ¼¿ï: ÇÐÁö»ç.
ÀÌ»óºó, ¿Àº´¼ö (1999). ȯ°æ°ü¿©µµ, ÀÚ±â- °¨½Ã ¹× À̼ºÀû/°¨¼ºÀû ¼Ò±¸¿¡ µû¸¥ ±×¸°±¤°íÈ¿°ú. ±¤°íÈ«º¸¿¬±¸,
7(1), 79- 100.
ÀÌÈ£¹è, Á¤ÀÌ±Ô (1997). À¯¸íÀÎ ±¤°í¸ðµ¨ ¼Ó¼ºÀÌ ±¤°íŵµ¿Í »óǥŵµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ±¤°íÇÐ ¿¬±¸, 8(2),
167- 181.
ÀÓäÇü, ÀÌ»óºó, ¸®´ë·æ (1999). TVÇÁ·Î±×·¥ÀÇ À¯¸Ó¼º ¿©ºÎ°¡ ÈÄ¼Ó À¯¸Ó±¤°í È¿°ú¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ±¤°í¹®È·ÐÁý,
5(1), 171- 192.
½Å¿ë¼ø (1986). ±¹³» Àϰ£Áö¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ °¡ÀüÁ¦Ç°±¤°íÀÇ ·¹À̾ƿô¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸. Áß¾Ó´ëÇб³ ½Å¹®Çаú ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
Á¤Ã濵, ÃÖÀÌ±Ô (1998). SPSSWINÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ Åë°èºÐ¼®. ¼¿ï: ¹«¿ª°æ¿µ»ç.
Á¶¹«±¤ (1992). ±¤°íÀÇ ·¹À̾ƿô°ú ±¸¼º¿ø¸®, ºÎ»ê¿©´ë³í¹®Áý, 34, 599- 620.
Â÷¹è±Ù (1998). »çȸ°úÇבּ¸¹æ¹ý (ÀüÁ¤ÆÇ). ¼¿ï: ¼¼¿µ»ç.
ߣï£×âçÈ(1999). ±¤°íÇ¥ÇöÀÇ °úÇÐÈ (½ÅÀμ·, À¯ÁøÇü ¿ª). Çѱ¹¾ð·ÐÀÚ·á°£Çàȸ.
Adler, K. (1992). ±¤°íÇÚµåºÏ (±èµ¿±â, À̵ÎÈñ ¿ª). ¼¿ï: ¹Ú¿µ»ç.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitude and
predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Batra, R., & Ray, M. (1985). How advertising works at contact.
In L. Alwitt & A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological processes and
advertising effects: Theory, research, and application. Hillsdale,
NJ: Erlbaum.
Brock, T. C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade
as determinant of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental
Social Psychology, 3, 296- 309.
Burnkrant, R. E., & Unnava, H. R. (1995). Effects of self-
referencing on persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 22, 17-
26.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979). Effects of message
repetition and position on cognitive response, recall and persuasion.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97- 109.
Edell, J. A., & Burke, M. C. (1984). The moderating effect
of attitude toward an Ad effect iveness under different process
ing conditions. In T. C. Kinner (Ed.), Advance in Consumer Research (Vol. 11,
pp. 644- 649). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response
to persuasion, and attitude change. In A. G. Greenwald, T . C. Brock,
& T. M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundations of attitudes
(pp. 148-170). New York: Academic Press.
Kandinsky, W. (1986). ¿¹¼ú¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ Á¤½ÅÀûÀÎ °Í¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© (±Ç¿µÇÊ ¿ª). ¼¿ï: ¿È´ç.
Lutz, J. (1985). Affective and cognitive antecedents of attitude
toward the Ad: A conceptual framework. In L. F. Alwitt & A.
A. Mitchell (Eds.), Psychological process es and advertising effects:
Theory, research, and application (pp. 45- 64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum.
MacKenzie, S. B., Lut z, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The
role of attitude toward the Ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness:
A tests of competing explanatations. Journal of Marketing Reasearch,
23, 130- 143.
Moriarity, S. E. (1999). Creative advertising: Theory and practice.
Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Olsen, G. D. (1994). Observation: The sounds of silence: Functions
and use of silence in television advertising. Journal of Advertising
Res earch, 34(5), 89- 95.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1999). Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼ǰú ¼³µæ (¸®´ë·æ, ÀÌ»óºó,
¹ÚÈñ¶û ¿ª). ¼¿ï: ¹ü¿ì»ç. (1986¿¡ ¿øº»ÃâÆÇ)
Russell, J. T., & Lane, W. R. (1993). Kleppner's advertising
procedure (12th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Stafford, M. R., Stafford, T. F., & Chowdhury, J. (1996). Predispositions
toward green issues: The potential efficacy of advertising appeals.
Journal of Current Issue and Research in Advertising, 18(1), 67-
79.
Stayman, D. M., & Aaker, D. A. (1988). Are all the effects
of Adinduced feeling mediated by Aad? Journal of Consumer Research,
15, 368- 373.
|