Âü°í¹®Çå

<±¹³» ¹®Çå>

°­±æÈ£¡¤±èÇöÁÖ¿ª, ¡¸Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼ǰú Àΰ£¡¹, Çѳª·¡, 1996.

±èÀçÀº, ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ Àǽİú Çൿ¾ç½Ä¡¹, ÀÌÈ­¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ÃâÆÇºÎ, 1987.

¹é¿Ï±â, ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀÇ ÇàÁ¤¹®È­¡¹, °í·Á´ëÇб³ ÃâÆÇºÎ, 1982.

¿©µ¿Âù, ¡¸¿Ü±¹ÀÎÀÌ º» Çѱ¹°ú Çѱ¹ÀΡ¹, ¹®¸®»ç, 1979.

À±Å¸², ¡¸Àǽı¸Á¶»óÀ¸·Î º» Çѱ¹ÀΡ¹, Çö¾Ï»ç, 1971.

À±Å¸², ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀΡ¹, Çö¾Ï»ç, 1987.

À̱ÔÅÂ, ¡¸ðü Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ Àǽı¸Á¶(ß¾)(ù»)¡¹, ¹®¸®»ç, 1983.

Â÷¹è±Ù, ¡¸»çȸ°úÇבּ¸¹æ¹ý¡¹, ¼¼¿µ»ç, 1994.

ÃÖÀç¼®, ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ »çȸÀû ¼º±ã¡¹, °³¹®»ç, 1976.

ÃÖÀç¼®, ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ »çȸÀû ¼º°Ý¡¹, ÇöÀ½»ç, 1994.

±è°æµ¿, "°ø¾÷È­ÀÇ »çȸÀû Ãæ°Ý°ú ¹Ì·¡ÀÇ °úÁ¦: Çѱ¹ »çȸÀÇ ÀüÅëÀû ¿ä¼Ò¿Í »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î," Çѱ¹Á¤½Å¹®È­¿¬±¸¿ø, 1979.

±è¿ì·æ, "¹®È­Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¿¬±¸ÀÇ °úÁ¦," ¡¸¿¬¼¼ Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼ÇÁ, No. 6, 1997, pp. 16-22.

¹è±¤¿ë, "µ¿¼­¾çÀÇ ±Ô¹ü¹®È­", ¡¸Á¤½Å¹®È­¡¹, 1978, pp. 155-160.

ÀÌÀÇÁ¤, "Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¸Þ½ÃÁö ÀÛ¼º Àü·«¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸: Àΰ£°ü°èÀÇ º¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ Â÷À̸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î," ¡¸Çѱ¹¾ð·ÐÇк¸¡¹, Á¦27È£, 1992, p. 381-411.

ÀÌÈ¿¼º, "¾ð·ÐÇÐÀÇ Çѱ¹È­¸¦ À§ÇÑ ½Ã·Ð," Çѱ¹¾ð·ÐÇÐȸÆí, ¡¸Çѱ¹Àû Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ¸ðµ¨ÀÇ Å½±¸ 14, 1993³â º½Ã¶Çмú¹ßǥȸ.

Â÷ÀçÈ£, "±¹¹Î¼ºÀÇ È°¼ºÈ­½Ã¾È ½Ã¾ÈÀÇ ½É¸®ÇÐÀû Á¢±Ù," ¡¸Çѱ¹ÀÎÀÇ À±¸®°ü¡¹, Çѱ¹Á¤½Å¹®È­¿¬±¸¿ø ¿¬±¸³íÃÑ 83-2, 1983, pp. 322-397.

ÇѽÂÁ¶, "ÀüÅëÀû °¡Ä¡°ü°ú Çö´ë ¹ÎÁÖÁÖÀÇ," ¡¸ÀüÅëÀû °¡Ä¡°ü°ú »õ °¡Ä¡°üÀÇ Á¤¸³¡¹, Çѱ¹Á¤½Å¹®È­¿¬±¸¿ø.

<ÇØ¿Ü ¹®Çå>

Babbie, E.R., Survey Research Methods, Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1973.

Baxter, L.A. & J. Philpott, "Attribution strategies for initiating and terminating relationships," Communication Quarterly, 30, 1982, pp. 210-216.

Boster, E.J. & J.B. Stiff, "Communication-Chaining Message Selection Behavior," Human Communication Research, 10, 1984, pp. 539-556.

Boster, F.J., ¡±Comments on The Utility of Compliance-Gaining Message Selection Tasks," Human Communication Research, 15, 1988, pp. 169-177.

Burleson, B.R., et al., "A Response to Item Desirability Effects in Compliance-Gaining Research," Human Communication Research, 15, 1988, pp. 152-161.

Burleson, B.R., et al, "Item Desirability Effects in Compliance-Gaining Research: Seven Studies Documenting Artifacts in the Strategy Selection Procedure," Human Communication Research, 14, 1988, pp. 432-434.

Cody, M.J., "A typology of disengagement strategies and an examination of the role intimacy reactions to inequity, and relational problems play in strategy selection," Communication Monographs, 49, 1982, pp. 148-170.

Cody, M.J., M.L. McLaughlin, & M.J. Schneider, "The impact of intimacy and relational consequences of the selection of interpersonal persuasion tactic: A reanalysis," Communication Quarterly, 1981, 29(2), pp. 91-106.

Cody, M.J. & M.I. McLaughlin, "Perceptions of compliance-gaining situations ' A dimensional analysis," Communication Monographs, 47, 1980, pp. 132-148.

Cody. M.J., et al., "Dimensions of Compliance-Gaining Situations," Human Communication Research, 9, 1983, pp. 99-113.

Greene, J.O., S.W. Smith & A.E. Lindsey, "Memory Representations of Compliance-Gaining Strategies and Tactics," Human Communication Research, 17, 1990, pp. 195-231.

Hunter, J.E. & F.J. Boster, "Compliance-gaining message selection experiments ' Some evidence for an empathy model," Unpublished manuscript, 1981.

Hunter, J.E. & F.J. Boster, "Situational differences in the selection of compliance-gaining message," Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association, San Antonio, TX, 1979.

Delia. J.G., S.L. Kline 8z B. R. Burleson, "The development of persuasive communication strategies in kindergartners through twelfth-graders," Communication Monographs, 46, 1979, pp. 241-256.

deTurck, M.A, "A Transactional Analysis of Compliance-Gaining Behavior Effects of noncompliance, Relational Contexts and Actors' Gender," Human Communication Research, 12, 1985, pp. 54-78.

Franklin J.B. 8z J.B. Stiff, "Compliance-Gaining Message Selection Behavior," Human Communication Research, 10, 1984, pp. 539-556.

Jackson, S., & D. Backus, "Are compliance-gaining strategies dependent on situational variables?," Central States Speech Journal, 1982, 33, pp. 46-479.

Clark, R.A., "The impact of self interest and desire for liking on selection of communication strategies," Communication Monographs, 46, 1979, pp. 257-Z73.

Tracy, K., &. T., et al "The discourse of requests: Assessment Compliance-Gaining Approach," Human Communication Research, 10, 1984, pp. 513-538.

Littlejohn, S.W., Theories of Human Communication, ±èÈï±Ô ¿Å±è, ¡¸Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç À̷С¹, ³ª³².

Lustig, M.W., & King, S.W., "The effect of communication apprehension and situation on communication strategy choice," Human Communication Research, 1980, 7, pp. 74-82.

McLaughlin, M.L., M.J. Cody & C.S. Robey, "Situational Influences on The Selection of Strategies to Resist Compliance-Gaining Attempts," Human Communication Research, 7, 1980, pp. 14-36.

McQuillen, J.S., D.C. Higginbotham & M.C. Cummings, "Compliance-Resisting Behaviors: The Effects of Age, Agent and Types of Request," Communication Yearbook 8, 1984, pp. 742-762.

McQuillen, J.S., "The Development of Listener-Adapted Compliance-Resisting Strategy," Human Communication Research, 12, 1986, pp. 359-375.

Miller, G.R. & R. Park, "Communication in Dissolving Relationships", in Duck, S.(Ed.), Personal Relationships 4: Dissolving Relationships (New York: Academic Press, 1982), pp. 127-154.

Miller, G., et al, "Compliance-gaining message strategies' A typology and some findings concerning effects of situational differences," Communication Mono graphs, 44, 1975, pp. 37-51.

Neuliep, J.W. & M. Mattson, "The Use of Deception as Compliance-Gaining Strategy," Human Communication Research, 16, 1990, pp. 409-421.

Neuliep, J.W. & V. Hazelton, "Enhanced conversational recall and reduced conversational interference as a function of cognitive complexity," Human Communication Research, 13, 1986, pp. 211-224.

Neulip, J. W. & V.H. Hazelton, Jr., "A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Japanese and American Persuasive Strategy Selection," International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 1985, pp. 398-404.

O'Keefe, B.J. & J.G. Delia, "Construct comprehensiveness and cognitive complexity as predictors of the number and strategic adaptation of arguments and appeals in a persuasive message," Communication Mono graphs, 1979, 46, pp. 231-240.

Roloff, M.E. & E.F. Barnicott, "The influence of dogmatism on the situational use of pro- and anti- social compliance-gaining strategies," Southern Speech Communication Journal, 1979, 45, pp. 37-54.

Roloff, M.E. & E.F. Barnicott, "The situational use of pro- and anti- social compliance-gaining strategies by high and low Machiavellians," in B.D. Ruben(Ed.), Communication Yearbook Z, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1978.

Williams, D.L. & F.J. Boster, The sects of beneficial situational characteristics, negativism and dogmatism on compliance-gaining message selection. Paper presented at the International Communication Association convention, Minneapolis, 1981.

Wiseman, R. L & W. Schenck-Hamline, "A Multidementional Scaling Validation of an Inductively-Deriverd Set of Compliance-Gaining Strategies," Communication Monographs, 48, 1981, pp. 251-270.

Wiseman, R.L., W. Schenck-Hamline & G.N. Georgacarakos, "A Model of Properties of Compliance-Gaining Strategies," Communication Quarterly, 30, 1982, pp. 92-100.

Wheeless, L.R., R. Barraclough & R. Stewart, "Compliance-Gaining Power in Persuasion," in Communication Yearbook 7, ed. R.N. Bostorm (Beely Hills, Calif.: Sage, 1983), pp. 105-145.

´ÙÀ½ ÆäÀÌÁö·Î