Âü°í¹®Çå
1. ±¹³»¹®Çå
±è¿ø¼ö, ±¤°íÇÐ °³·Ð, ¼¿ï:°æ¹®»ç, 1986.
±è¿ìö¿Ü, Çö´ëÅë°èÇÐ, ¼¿ï:¿µÁö¹®È»ç, 1983.
±èÁ¤³â, Åë°èÇÐ, ¼¿ï:°æ¹®»ç, 1984.
±èÈ¿¼®, Åë°èÇÐ, ¼¿ï:Çü¼³ÃâÆÇ»ç, 1980.
±èÈï±Ô, »çȸÅë°èºÐ¼®(SPSS/PC), ³ª³², 1990.
¸®´ë·æ, ±¤°íÀÇ °úÇÐ, ¼¿ï:³ª³², 1988.
¸®´ë·æ/À̸íõ, Çö´ë»çȸ¿Í ±¤°í, ¼¿ï:³ª³², 1988.
¼Û¿ë¼·, Çö´ë ¸¶¾ÆÄÉÆÃ·Ð, ¼¿ï:¹ý¹®»ç, 1987.
¼Û¿ë¼·/¸®´ë·æ, Çö´ë±¤°í·Ð, ¼¿ï:¹«¿ª°æ¿µ»ç, 1985.
¿ÀµÎ¹ü, ±¤°í Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀÌ¼Ç ½Å·Ð, ¼¿ï:Àü¿¹¿ø, 1989.
ÀÓÁ¾¿ø, Çö´ë ¸¶¾ÆÄÉÆÃ °ü¸®·Ð, ¼¿ï:¹«¿ª°æ¿µ»ç, 1987.
Â÷¹è±Ù, Ä¿¹Â´ÏÄÉÀ̼ÇÇÐ °³·Ð(»ó¡¤ÇÏ), ¼¿ï:¼¼¿µ»ç, 1985.
ÃÖº´·æ, Ãֽű¤°í·Ð, ¼¿ï:¹Ú¿µ»ç, 1986.
ÇѽŰæÁ¦¿¬±¸¼Ò, Áõ±Ç°ÁÂ, ¼¿ï:ÇѽŰæÁ¦¿¬±¸¼Ò, 1989.
2. ¿Ü±¹¹®Çå
Alexander, Ralph S. and The Committee on Definitions, Marketing Definitions, (Chicago:American Marketing Association, 1963).
Bogart, Leo, Strategy and Advertising, (New York:Harcourt Brace Havanovich, 1967).
Chow, G.C., Econometrics, (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1984).
Dorfman , R. and P. O. Steiner, "Optimal Advertising and Optimal Quality", The American Economic Review, Vol. 44, 1954.
Dunn, S. Watson and Arnold M. Barban, Adveretising:its Role in Modern Marketing, (Chicago:Dryden, 1982).
Kotler, Philip, Principles of Marketing, (New Jersey:Englewood, Prentice-Hall, 1985).
Lilien Gary L. and Philip Kotler, Marketing Decision Making:A Model-Building Approach, (New York:Harper & Row, 1983).
Longman, Kenneth A., Advertising, (New York:Harcourt Brace Janovich, 1971).
McCarthy, E. Jerome, Basic Marketing:A Managerial Approach, (Homewood, Ill.:Richard D. Irwin, 1981).
Scherter, J. C., The Economics of Industrial Organization, (New Jersey:Englewood, Prentice-Hall, 1981).
Wright John S. and Daniel S. Warner, Advertising, (New York:McGraw-Hill, 1966).
ABSTRACT
A Study on the Relationship between Advertising and Sales:An Empirical Investigation of D securities Co., Ltd.
Kim, Young-sang, PR/Advertising Major, Graduate School of Mass Communications, Chung-Ang University, Prof. De Ryeong Lyi, Ph. D.
Nowadays, advertising is one of the most important means for increase sales and profit for a firm in the industrialized society.
This study presents an both theoretical and empirical invetigation of the relationship between advertising and sales.
To accomplish this goal, we first review literature concerned with advertising to capture the general principles of advertising. Especially, we identify the response function of consumers to the advertising of the firms.
Next, we discuss theoretically the concept and models of the response function, that is, the relationship between advertising and sales. Also this forms the basis for empirical investigation.
With this theoretical background in mind, we perform an empirical investigation of the Korean stock industry. The selection of Korean industry as the sample is based upon two reasons:one is its practical importance and the other theoretical easiness.
The results show the followings:
(1) the response function is a concave function, that is, sales grows at a decreasing rate as advertising expenditure increases,
(2) while both the quadratic and log models show good explanation, the quadratic model is practically preferred, since the log model reveals a paradox and
(3) dynamics of the advertising effect, that is carry-over and decay effects, is not tested statistically in Korean stock industry.
Therefore, we identified the quadratic model as the best one fits into practical use.
´ÙÀ½ ÆäÀÌÁö·Î