Abstract
A Comparative Study on the Perception of Corporate
Social Responsibility by General Public, NGO, and Corporate
PR Practitioners
Lee, Hyun-ou (Professor, Dept.
of advertising and public relations, Hanyang University)
Kim, Hyung-suk (Visiting professor,
Dept. of Mass Communication, Tongmyung University of
Information Technology)
Recently, the concept of ¡®corporate social responsibility
(CSR)¡¯ has received a wide attention from various academic
fields as modern society requires corporations to take
part more actively in building a better living environment.
Since Carroll¡¯s (1979) pioneering work on this subject,
CSR has been known to be a multi-dimensional construct
consisting of economic, legal, ethical, and discretionary
responsibilities.
However, in spite of common understanding regarding
the concept of CSR, there is a paucity of empirical
research measuring the concept directly. This tendency
is due to the fact that a valid scale measuring CSR
empirically is hard to find up to now.
Backdrop to this, this study endeavors to develop
a measurement scale for CSR by combining the existing
body of literature on this subject with the result of
the content analysis on the websites of Korean 100 corporations.
Consequently, a 20-item instrument designed to measure
4 dimensions of CSR is developed.
By utilizing a newly developed scale, this study
found that Korean people value legal responsibility
of corporation higher than economic responsibility of
corporation. Since this finding is counterintuitive
to Carroll¡¯s original expectations, this paper challenges
the notion of universality of Carroll¡¯s hierarchical
model of CSR.
Moreover, this study also witnessed that the perception
of CSR hinges on the types of audiences. Specifically,
while NGO members have most critical views regarding
the activities of CSR, corporate PR practitioners have
most positive views, with the general publics standing
in-between. Upon the tests of four research questions
drawn for the study, detailed implications for future
corporate communication were addressed.
Key words : corporate social responsibility, perception,
comparison
|