[ set DATA_HOME $env(UNIWEB_DOC_ROOT) source $DATA_HOME/init.appl ]

Âü°í¹®Çå

 

±è¿µ¼® (2002) ¡¶µðÁöÅÐ ¹Ìµð¾î¿Í »çȸ¡·. ³ª³²ÃâÆÇ»ç.

À±±âÈ£. ¿ìÁö¼÷. ±èº´ÁØ (1999.12) ¡¶Á¤º¸È­»çȸ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÁöÀûÀç»ê±Ç º¸È£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °æÁ¦Àû ºÐ¼®¡·. Á¤º¸Åë½ÅÁ¤Ã¥¿¬±¸¿ø Á¤Ã¥º¸°í¼­.

Barlow, J. P. (1997). The Economy of Ideas, WIRED 2.03, at 9.

Benkler, Y. (1996). Rules of the Road for the Information Superhighway: Electronic Communication and the Law. St. Paul: West Publishing.

Bunker, M. D. (2002). Eroding Fair Use: The Transformative Use Doctrine After Campbell, 7. Communica- tion Law and Policy 1.

Cate, F. H. (1996). Law in Cyberspace, 39. Howard Law Journal, 565.

Cohen, J. (1996). A Right to Read Anonymously: A Closer Look at Copyright Management in Cyberspace, 28. Connecticut Law Review, 981.

Dyson, E. (1997). Intellectual Property On the Net. Release 1.0.

Elkin- Koren, N. (1996). Cyberlaw and Social Change: A Democratic Approach to Copyright Law in Cyberspace, 14. Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal, 215.

Fessenden, G. (2002). Peer-To-Peer Technology: Analysis of Contributory Infringement and Fair Use. 42 IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology, 391.

Katsh, M. E. (1989). The Electronic Media and the Transformation of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lape, L. G. (1995). Transforming Fair Use: The Productive Factor in Fair Use Doctrine, 58. Albany Law Review 677.

Lessig, L. (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. New York: Randon House.

Leval, P. N. (1990). Toward a Fair Use Standard, 103. Harvard Law Review, 1105.

Mahon, J. V. (1996). A Commentary on Proposals For Copyright Protection on the National Information Infrastructure, 22. Rutgers Computer & Technology Law Journal 233.

Patry, W. F. (1980). The Fair Use Privilege, PLI Order No. G4-3760.

Ploman, E. & Hamilton, C. (1980). Copyright: Intellectual Property in the Information Age. London, Boston and Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Vaidhyanathan, S. (2001). Copyrights and Copywrongs, The Rise of Intellectual Property and How It Threatens Creativity. New York: New York University Press.

¼ö¿øÁö¹æ¹ý¿ø ¼º³²Áö¿ø 2002. 7. 9. 2002Ä«ÇÕ77 °áÁ¤ ÔÔÌÈò¢Û° ÀçÆÇ¼Ò 2002. 4. 11. øÁà÷ 14(«è) 22010 °áÁ¤

A & M Records v. Napster, 239 F3d. 1004 (9th Cir. 2001), affirming in part and reversing in part, 114 F. Supp. 2d 896 (N. D. Cal. 2000). Sony Corp. of America v. Universal Studios, Inc., 464 U. S. 417 (1984), reversing 659 F. 2d 963 (9th Cir. 1981) Campbell v. Acuff- Rose Music. Inc., 510 U. S. 569, 114 S. Ct. 1164 (1994), reversing 972 F. 2d 1429 (6th. Cir. 1992).

Buma & Stermra v. Kazaa (Amsterdam Court of Appeal, Mar. 28, 2002).

´ÙÀ½ ÆäÀÌÁö·Î